The Lockheed Martin X-55 Advanced Composite Cargo Aircraft

You may look at the LM X-55 and think ho-hum and say, “It looks just like a Fairchild Dornier 328JET.” It certainly does and is, in fact, based on that design. The X-55 certainly lacks the implied glamour of an exotic configuration like the X-3 or X-29 experimental airplanes. Don’t let that fool you. Despite the yeoman-like appearance the X-55 is an important tool in the use and development of carbon composites in aircraft construction.

Developed by Lockheed Martin’s  famed “Skunk Works,” the X-55, or more precisely, the Advanced Composite Cargo Aircraft, is very interestingly built airplane. Imagine being able to build an airplane in fewer parts. In the ACCA, program specifically the upper and lower rear fuselage was built in as little as 300 parts as opposed to 3000!

The X-55 first flew on 2 June 2009 from Air Force Plant 42 in Palmdale, CA.

Composite airplanes in one form or another have been around for over 30 years. Composites offer lighter overall weight, and greater strength. Over those 30 years, have become an increasing part of an airplane’s gross weight. Composites make airplanes like the Cirrus, F/A-18, 777, and 787 possible, meaning more efficient flight for less cost per hour.

As you can see by the illustration below, the number of parts of the airplane have been reduce by a very impressive 90%:

Lockheed Martin’s You Tube Channel offers and interesting overview of the X-55:

Lockheed Martin’s Official Page for the Advanced Composite Cargo Aircraft Program.

As a side note, I’m not aware of what the current status of this program is. If readers have any information I’d appreciate it :)

About these ads

2 Comments

Filed under Aeronautical Engineering, Airplanes, Flying, USAF

2 responses to “The Lockheed Martin X-55 Advanced Composite Cargo Aircraft

  1. Bill Brandt

    I think the manufacturing is a whole different discipline, which is why they have had so many delays with the 787. It’s stronger but if they get into a small ground accident isn’t it a lot more difficult to repair? Since each section is so much bigger and an integral part of the plane…

    I think a lot of interesting stuff has come out of that hanger; not the least the SR-71…

  2. htom

    That’s my first thought, Bill; how do you fix it? Are there super-critical spots that if hit the structure fails?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s